Seat Insights
Org-level recommendations for right-sizing seat assignments. All figures are directional — confirm before acting.
Monthly Seat Spend
—
assigned seats · only users on Claude Pulse counted
Potential Savings
—
downgrade + dormant candidates
Review / Downgrade
—
premium users below standard baseline
Upgrade Candidates
—
standard users above 90th percentile
Premium Seat Analysis
Each premium user ranked against the standard-user cohort. Dormant = inactive 14d+ with no billing. Downgrade = PAYG below standard median. Review = median–P75. Justified = above P75. Investigate = high PAYG but ≤5 sessions/month — may be automation, not human use.
User Team Bucket Percentile Sessions (30d) Active Days Cost (30d) vs. Standard Median Last Active
Loading…
Upgrade Candidates — Standard Users
Standard users ($25/mo) above the 90th percentile of the standard cohort. These are your highest-leverage Claude Code users — the extra $100/month buys capacity and tier access for people who demonstrably need it.
User Team Percentile Sessions (30d) Active Days Cost (30d) Last Active
Loading…
Cost signal: Figures derive from OTLP telemetry with ~2–5% drift from actual billed amounts. Treat all dollar values as directional, not exact.
Human confirmation required: Seat type sometimes reflects role or policy (team leads, contractors) rather than raw usage. This page surfaces candidates — a person should confirm each change before acting.